14 Strange Medieval Laws People Actually Followed
Plenty of supposed medieval laws are internet folklore, passed around without a single statute behind them. The ones below are different, because they were recorded in legal texts, court proceedings, or royal orders, although the details and enforcement varied.
Some now read like jokes. Their original audiences were not laughing, especially those who faced public punishment.
A Pig Went to Trial and Lost
In 1386, a sow in the Norman town of Falaise was sentenced to death after fatally injuring a baby. A court ordered the animal mutilated on its head and forelegs before it was hanged in public.
Historical accounts also report that the sow was dressed in human clothing for the execution, although that detail comes from later descriptions of the event.
Rats Got a Defense Lawyer
In the early 16th century, a church court in Autun, France, reportedly summoned rats accused of destroying crops. The lawyer Bartholomew Chassenée became famous for defending animals in legal proceedings, and later accounts associate him with the rats’ case.
When the rats failed to appear, the defense reportedly argued that the summons gave them too little time to travel safely past the town’s cats. The story became one of the best-known examples of medieval animal litigation, although the surviving details are less secure than the general historical evidence for animal trials.
Bakers Faced the Hurdle for Short Loaves
England’s Assize of Bread and Ale, a series of medieval regulations that included a well-known version dating to 1266, tied the price and weight of a loaf to the price of grain. A baker caught selling underweight bread could face penalties that included fines and public punishment, depending on the circumstances and local enforcement.
The tradition of the baker’s dozen, thirteen loaves handed over for twelve, is often linked to bakers’ efforts to avoid penalties for short-weight bread, although the exact origins of the custom remain uncertain. A good loaf was apparently worth the extra bread.
Objects That Killed People Were Forfeited
Under the English law of deodand, anything that caused a person’s death, such as a cart, a horse, or a millwheel, could be forfeited to the Crown. A jury at the inquest set a value on the offending object, and the value could be collected in place of surrendering the object itself.
The name comes from the Latin for “given to God.” The proceeds were associated with religious or charitable purposes, although the practice varied.
The law stayed on the books for centuries and was not abolished until 1846.
Shoe Toes Were Measured by Parliament
Fashionable shoes with enormously long points, known as crakows or poulaines, became such a nuisance that Parliament restricted extravagant clothing and footwear under Edward IV in 1463. The statute imposed limits on the length of shoe points according to social rank, although the exact 2-inch limit for everyone below the rank of lord is difficult to establish from the broad summaries often repeated today.
The points had been stuffed to hold their shape, which made them a status symbol as much as a hazard. The restrictions applied to the making and wearing of certain fashionable garments and shoes.
Welsh Law Priced a Cat by Its Mousing Skill
The laws attributed to the Welsh king Hywel Dda put a precise value on cats. A kitten was worth one penny until it opened its eyes, and its value increased after it proved capable of catching mice.
Anyone who killed or stole a valuable cat, particularly one used to guard a barn, owed compensation in grain. The amount was measured by pouring wheat over the animal until its body was covered, according to surviving accounts of the Welsh legal tradition.
That made a dead mouser an expensive mistake.
A Dead Norman Could Cost a Whole District
After the Norman Conquest, the Crown imposed a fine called murdrum when a Norman was found dead and the killer was not handed over. The local community could be held responsible under the system unless it met the conditions for avoiding the fine.
A related procedure, known as the presentment of Englishry, required proof that a dead person was English rather than Norman. Over time, the two practices became closely associated, although they were distinct legal mechanisms.
The murdrum fine declined as the legal system changed, and the practice had fallen out of use by the 14th century.
Servants Were Told What Their Dinner Could Be
A statute of 1363 under Edward III tried to regulate clothing and consumption according to social rank and occupation. Its provisions restricted the fabrics and furs people could wear, with distinctions based on income and status.
The legislation also attempted to curb excessive spending and enforce social distinctions through dress. The detailed claim that servants were universally limited to one daily meal of meat or fish, and that the entire package was repealed the following year, is not sufficiently established to state as fact.
Dogs Near the King’s Deer Lost Three Claws
Royal forest law made the king’s deer nearly untouchable, and that included restrictions on dogs that might chase them. In areas where the custom applied, dogs could be expeditated, a procedure that removed three claws from a forefoot and left the animal less able to pursue game.
The Charter of the Forest, issued in 1217 and later confirmed in revised form, regulated the practice and limited where it could be carried out. Deer were the king’s business, and the dogs paid for it.
Creditors Starved on the Debtor’s Doorstep
Early medieval Irish law allowed a creditor to pursue a debtor by fasting on the debtor’s doorstep, a practice called troscad. The method worked because of status: a debtor who let a hunger striker of equal or higher rank go without food could suffer legal and reputational consequences while remaining liable for the debt.
The custom was recorded in the Brehon law texts and treated as a recognized legal step, not simply a protest. Few other legal systems made a growling stomach a formal summons.
Reading One Psalm Could Save a Life
Under benefit of clergy, a person accused of certain felonies in England could claim a privilege that transferred the case from a secular court to an ecclesiastical court. As the privilege expanded beyond ordained clergy, the ability to read became a test of eligibility.
The test was usually the opening of Psalm 51, which became known as the neck verse because it could save a neck from the noose. From the late 15th century onward, some laypeople who claimed the privilege were branded on the thumb to prevent them from claiming it again.
Some illiterate prisoners reportedly memorized the passage to bluff their way through.
Trial by Combat Handicapped the Man
A 1467 combat manual by German fencing master Hans Talhoffer illustrates a form of judicial duel between a man and a woman. The man stood in a pit up to his waist with one arm restricted, while the woman was armed with a stone wrapped in cloth.
The setup was a prescribed arrangement depicted in the manuscript, rather than a universal rule governing medieval trials by combat. The illustrations are so detailed that they remain a key source for how such duels were imagined and described in late medieval fighting traditions.
Football Was Banned to Keep Archers Sharp
In 1363, Edward III ordered sheriffs to make sure able-bodied men practiced archery on their days off. Games considered idle, including football, handball, and cockfighting, were prohibited so that they would not draw men away from archery practice.
The order came during the Hundred Years’ War, when the longbow was an important weapon in English warfare. Football has been in trouble with English authorities almost as long as it has existed.
The King Owned Every Stranded Whale
An English statute from the early 14th century, known as De Prerogativa Regis, declared whales and sturgeon to be royal fish. When one washed ashore or was caught near the coast, it could fall under the Crown’s prerogative.
Traditional accounts of the rule say the king received the whale’s head and the queen its tail, which was associated with the use of whalebone in clothing and accessories. The division should not be taken to mean that every stranded whale was automatically handled this way in practice.
Few landowners ever got to keep a washed-up whale.
Rules for a World Without Paperwork
Taken together, these laws show a society trying to govern with the tools at hand. Without police forces, databases, or reliable records, medieval authorities leaned on public shaming, collective fines, and strict classifications of who could wear, eat, or own what.
The results can look absurd, but each rule reflected concerns its makers considered urgent, from bread prices to poaching to the loyalty of a conquered population.
The strangeness is partly a matter of distance. A pig in the dock or a cat priced in wheat made sense inside a legal order that mixed religion, property, and honor into a single system.
The people who followed these laws were not gullible. They were working with the logic their world supplied, much as every era does.
More from Go2Tutors!
- The Romanov Crown Jewels and Their Tragic Fate
- 13 Historical Mysteries That Science Still Can’t Solve
- Famous Hoaxes That Fooled the World for Years
- 15 Child Stars with Tragic Adult Lives
- 16 Famous Jewelry Pieces in History
Like Go2Tutors’s content?Follow us on MSN.
